Your team needs more engineering capacity
A feature, integration, or internal tool is waiting behind other priorities. Add a senior engineer for one workstream, using your existing patterns and review process.
Add senior engineering capacity for a defined piece of work. Shore AI implements a feature, integration, fix, or internal tool inside your existing codebase, with tests, review context, documentation, and a handoff to your team.
This is hands-on build work. Thomas does the coding directly. If the first build creates value, further delivery can be agreed as another phase. Scope, acceptance criteria, access, review ownership, and the support period are defined before implementation.
Open the one-page briefOne real backlog item, compressed through the same gates your team already trusts.
Scope to handoff
Pick the backlog item, success criteria, constraints, and review owner.
Agentic coding with repo-aware exploration, patches, and existing patterns.
Tests, QA notes, edge cases, and explicit tradeoffs.
Team review, requested changes, and quality gates.
Ship the work, hand off context, and keep going if the loop earns more trust.
Start with a defined workstream, an available review owner, and acceptance criteria your team can assess.
A feature, integration, or internal tool is waiting behind other priorities. Add a senior engineer for one workstream, using your existing patterns and review process.
Define one implementation milestone with acceptance criteria, visible progress, and review-ready output. Your team can assess the result before agreeing to further delivery.
Teams that need real engineering capacity now and want the side effect of a concrete example that changes how people think about delivery.
You have priority work and limited engineering capacity. You need useful software shipped, not another tool debate.
You need a useful feature or integration implemented, with a clear scope and someone accountable for the work.
You are evaluating AI-native practices. You need a controlled way to add delivery capacity and validate the method on real production work.
You want higher leverage without lowering review standards, maintainability, or trust.
Working code and concrete artifacts from one real workstream, not a strategy deck or training session.
A real backlog item implemented directly and left merged, staged, or merge-ready against agreed acceptance criteria.
Coverage where it matters plus explicit manual verification notes.
Help getting the change through your normal release path.
Usage notes, implementation decisions, and follow-up context.
The AI-assisted engineering loop your team can inspect, question, and reuse because it was attached to shipped work.
AI engineering pilot
One agreed workstream with visible checkpoints, normal quality gates, and a documented handoff. Timing is agreed after reviewing the task, codebase, and team dependencies.
01 · Scope
Choose the first build, define acceptance criteria, map the repo, and agree on review gates.
02 · Build
Implement the highest-value path with agentic repo search, patches, tests, and reviewer context.
03 · Verify
Run checks, harden edge cases, document tradeoffs, and review the PR in your environment.
04 · Handoff
Merge, stage, or demo the work, hand off context, and decide whether the next workstream is worth continuing into.
Discipline, transparency, and your data stay front and center.
Work happens in your repos and environments. You retain all IP.
We use scoped access with audit logs and remove access when we are done.
You see progress, decisions, and changes throughout.
We follow your standards, tests, and review process.
We leave you with code, docs, and context you can run with.
Let's choose the first workstream, move it through your quality gates, and keep going only if the work is worth it.